Facebook Instagram Linkedin RSS Twitter

Home
News in Brief
Product Updates
Tech Advisor
Marketing 101
Business
Cutting Costs
Lawyer@home

Search

Supplier Listings
Advertise with us
Humour
Legal Jobs
Subscribe
About Us
Product Matrix
Latest Court Reports

Facebook Instagram Linkedin RSS Twitter

Sign in

Welcome! Log into your account

your username

your password

Forgot your password? Get help

Privacy Statement

Password recovery

Recover your password

your email

A password will be e-mailed to you.

Home
News in Brief
Product Updates
Tech Advisor
Marketing 101
Business
Cutting Costs
Lawyer@home

Home News in brief Local e4 Test Gif Banner

Local

e4 Test Gif Banner

8th June 2017

537

Previous articleImprove M&A Success with Thorough Due Diligence

Next articlee4 Test Gif Banner

RELATED ARTICLES MORE FROM AUTHOR

Hogan Lovells Johannesburg office

Local

Hogan Lovells to close offices in Johannesburg, Sydney and Warsaw

Champion Mindset GRM recruitment

Local

World Champion Boxer Meets Legal Titans: A Masterclass in Resilience

what should happen to the Post Office in South Africa

Local

What should happen to the Post Office?

LEAVE A REPLY Cancel reply

Please enter your comment!

Please enter your name here

You have entered an incorrect email address!

Please enter your email address here

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Please enter an answer in digits:

12 − 6 =

Δ

South Korea holds its president in solitary with cold cereal, no frills - The Washington Post
His lawyers failed Thursday evening to have the detainment order ... 60 bodies pulled from illegal mine in South Africa; many more trapped · 5.
South African police end mine rescue operation with at least 78 dead and 246 survivors
STILFONTEIN, South Africa (AP) — South African police ended a ... Don't Miss. Lawyers for detained South Korean president say he … Impeached South ...
South Korean court rejects petition to release impeached president detained over martial law - WFTV
Lawyers for impeached South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol have failed in their court effort to secure his release.

SAFLII – Gauteng High Court

Roberts and Others v Minister of Social Development and Others (32838/05) [2010] ZAGPHC 1 (17 March 2010)
McPherson v Khanyise Capital (Pty) Ltd and Others (24309/08) [2009] ZAGPHC 57 (27 February 2009)
National Potato Co-Operative v Price Waterhouse Coopers Inc and Others (33297/1999) [2009] ZAGPHC 38 (27 February 2009)
Total South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Gerhard Oosthuizen t/a Happy Homes Filling Station (A1193/06) [2009] ZAGPHC 39 (27 February 2009)
Nu-Angle Medical (Proprietary) Limited and Another v Coloplast A/S and Another (35345/08) [2009] ZAGPHC 59 (26 February 2009)
S v Pretorius [2009] ZAGPHC 62; A544/08 (26 February 2009)
First Rand Bank Limited t/a Fiat Finance v Smith (45520/2008) [2009] ZAGPHC 47 (25 February 2009)
Mamede and Others v Strategic Executive Department of Housing, City Planning, Land and Environmental Planning of the City of Tshwane and Others (10864/02) [2009] ZAGPHC 37 (25 February 2009)
S v Ramahlo (A159/09) [2009] ZAGPHC 46 (25 February 2009)
Thebe Ya Bophelo Healthcare Administrators (Proprietary) Limited and Others v National Bargaining Council for the Road Freight Industry and Another (39919/2008) [2009] ZAGPHC 36; (2009) 30 ILJ 1031 (W) (25 February 2009)
Rossouw v Du Preez (55201/2008) [2009] ZAGPHC 43 (24 February 2009)
Redlex 226 (Pty) Ltd v Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd and Others [2009] ZAGPHC 61; 28485/06 (24 February 2009)
Klass v Contract Interiors CC (in liquidation) and Others (08/31973) [2009] ZAGPHC 35 (23 February 2009)
Moore v Conradie and Another (23771/2003) [2009] ZAGPHC 41 (23 February 2009)
Shongwe v South African Rail Commuter Corporation (41334/2007) [2009] ZAGPHC 45 (20 February 2009)
Nasionale Aartappel Kooperasie Beperk v Price Waterhouse Coopers Incorporated en Andere (33297/1999) [2009] ZAGPHC 33 (20 February 2009)
Sheriff for Krugersdorp v United Aviation Services and Another (1099/2007) [2009] ZAGPHC 34 (20 February 2009)
Khumalo and Another v South African Reserve Bank and Another (50711/08) [2009] ZAGPHC 32; [2009] 2 All SA 385 (T) (19 February 2009)
Madisha v Motlakwana and Another (30488/06/07) [2009] ZAGPHC 42 (18 February 2009)
Standard Bank of South Africa v Van Vuuren (49747/07) [2009] ZAGPHC 56 (18 February 2009)

EDITOR PICKS

Access to justice

Transforming Access to Justice

19th August 2019

Law firms and cybercrime future

Cybercrime: Law firms under threat

12th August 2019

Challenges ahead for the legal industry in South Africa

Some Challenges Facing the South African Legal Fraternity

29th July 2019

POPULAR POSTS

Shortcut key of the week (8) – quick Afrikaans characters

19th September 2011

Acer recalls Aspire notebooks as casings melt

11th January 2010

Blockchain and Law

Application of Blockchain in South Africa – is it real or...

26th June 2019

POPULAR CATEGORY

Local576
Text funnies362
Conveyancing in South Africa296
Efficient practice260
Snippets207
Legal content204
International204
Efficient business process168
Other154

ABOUT US

Tech4Law is an independent and unbiased practical practice journal focused on helping lawyers practise law more effectively and efficiently.

Contact us: malcolmp@tech4law.co.za

FOLLOW US

Facebook Instagram Linkedin RSS Twitter

Privacy Statement
PAIA Manual
Terms & Conditions

© Newspaper by TagDiv